Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
2.
Infect Dis Now ; 51(2): 164-169, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32387296

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic treatment and arthroscopic or open drainage is the gold standard for septic arthritis. Full recovery takes time after surgery and hospital stay is longer than for arthrocentesis at the bedside. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of arthrocentesis (medical approach) versus a surgical approach. METHOD: We retrospectively included 97 cases of native joint arthritis (hip and knee) between 2010 and 2017. The primary outcome was treatment failure of medical and surgical approaches (defined as surgical intervention within 7 days following diagnosis). Risk factors of failure were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 72 cases of knee arthritis, of which 43 and 29 were treated medically and surgically, respectively; 25 cases of hip arthritis, of which 8 and 17 were treated medically and surgically, respectively. Failure was observed in 39.2% of cases in the medical group and in 30.4% in the surgical group (P=0.2) (37.5% vs. 52.9% and 39.5% vs. 17.2% for hip and knee, respectively). The univariate analysis identified age and male sex as risk factors for failure (P=0.048 and P=0.02, respectively), but only age was independently associated with failure (P=0.04). Hospital length of stay was 12 days shorter in the medical group (21 vs. 33 days, P=0.02), sequelae were less frequent and less important in the medical group (31.7% vs. 60%). CONCLUSION: The medical treatment seems to be as effective as the surgical treatment for native joint septic arthritis with a shorter hospital stay and better functional outcome. Further prospective studies are warranted.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Articulação do Quadril/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/microbiologia , Artrocentese/métodos , Artroscopia/métodos , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16(1): 568, 2016 10 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27737642

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Outcome of patients with streptococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is not well known. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study that involved patients with total hip/knee prosthetic joint (THP/TKP) infections due to Streptococcus spp. from 2001 through 2009. RESULTS: Ninety-five streptococcal PJI episodes (50 THP and 45 TKP) in 87 patients of mean age 69.1 ± 13.7 years met the inclusion criteria. In all, 55 out of 95 cases (57.9 %) were treated with debridement and retention of the infected implants with antibiotic therapy (DAIR). Rifampicin-combinations, including with levofloxacin, were used in 52 (54.7 %) and 28 (29.5 %) cases, respectively. After a mean follow-up period of 895 days (IQR: 395-1649), the remission rate was 70.5 % (67/95). Patients with PJIs due to S. agalactiae failed in the same proportion as in the other patients (10/37 (27.1 %) versus 19/58 (32.7 %); p = .55). In the univariate analysis, antibiotic monotherapy, DAIR, antibiotic treatments other than rifampicin-combinations, and TKP were all associated with a worse outcome. The only independent variable significantly associated with the patients' outcomes was the location of the prosthesis (i.e., hip versus knee) (OR = 0.19; 95 % CI 0.04-0.93; p value 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of streptococcal PJIs may not be as good as previously reported, especially for patients with an infected total knee arthroplasty. Rifampicin combinations, especially with levofloxacin, appear to be suitable antibiotic regimens for these patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrite/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Prótese de Quadril/microbiologia , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/microbiologia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Prótese do Joelho/microbiologia , Levofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Arch Pediatr ; 20(7): 775-8, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23759242

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infectious endocarditis in children requires prolonged antibiotic therapy. In adults, antibiotics administrated subcutaneously such as teicoplanin are an alternative to intravenous treatment. CASE REPORT: We report the use of subcutaneous teicoplanin, after an initial antibiotic treatment administrated intravenously, for 2 children treated for infectious endocarditis following an initial cardiac surgery. Serum concentrations of teicoplanin were within the target range after the adaptation in the teicoplanin subcutaneous dosages. The treatment was effective for both cases. No specific side effects related to the treatment were reported. DISCUSSION: Subcutaneous administration could be used for prolonged antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infectious endocarditis in children, after an initial intravenous treatment. Variability of the bioavailability of antibiotics administrated subcutaneously requires regular testing. Prospective, randomized trials comparing intravenous and subcutaneous administration of teicoplanin should be conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
9.
Med Mal Infect ; 41(2): 87-91, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21106315

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Lymph node infection is the most frequent localization of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. However, there is still no consensus on the length of antimicrobial treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in the Department of infectious diseases and internal medicine in the Amiens Teaching Hospital, France. All patients diagnosed with lymph node tuberculosis between 1998 and 2007 were included; some patients presented with bi- or multifocal tuberculosis. The aim of the study was a practice analysis. RESULTS: We studied 48 medical records, 16 were excluded for lack of more than 40% of data or because lymph node tuberculosis was non-active. The mean age of the 32 patients included was 49 years. The mean duration of treatment was 10.9 months (standard deviation 2.6, median 11, range 6-18). There was no statistical age difference between subgroups (lymph node tuberculosis versus multifocal tuberculosis). There was no significant difference between the 6-month treatment group and the 9-month treatment group in term of clinical response. One relapse was diagnosed, eight patients (25%) were lost to follow-up at 1 year after treatment. DISCUSSION AND REVIEW: No reliable published data was found as to the optimal duration of treatment. A high quality clinical trial should be carried out to suggest a consensus.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Gerenciamento Clínico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Hospitais Universitários/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos/diagnóstico , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Pathol Biol (Paris) ; 56(7-8): 461-6, 2008.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18842353

RESUMO

The diagnosis of cat scratch disease (CSD) associated adenitis relies classically on the association of clinical, epidemiological and bacteriological criteria. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) looks like a more competitive diagnostic trial than serology. We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive positive and negative values of serology in routine diagnosis of CSD. A retrospective study over five years was led among patients presenting a suspicion of CSD and having a serology and/or a PCR. The Gold standard for diagnosis was PCR. The serological tests of Bartonella henselae was performed once in 482 patients, of which 2% (11 out of 482) were positive, and twice in only 39 patients (8%). The PCR diagnosis method for B. henselae was performed in biopsy of specimen lymph nodes in 28 patients and 14 out of 28 were positive. In nine patients, the diagnosis was exclusively made by PCR. Among the 14 patients whose PCR was negative, two had a positive serology and in three others patients, the serology was not performed. The sensitivity of serology was 35%, this confirms the low sensitivity of the serology in the CSD diagnosis. The diagnosis was confirmed in 56% of cases where PCR was performed. This led us to propose to perform systematically the PCR test for B. henselae in case of adenitis possibly associated with CSD.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Bartonella henselae/isolamento & purificação , Doença da Arranhadura de Gato/diagnóstico , Linfonodos/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Animais , Bartonella henselae/genética , Bartonella henselae/imunologia , Doença da Arranhadura de Gato/microbiologia , Gatos/microbiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
11.
Med Mal Infect ; 38(9): 465-70, 2008 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18718729

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: The main characteristics of clindamycin are adequate for treatment of osteoarticular infections (OAI): good bone diffusion, broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and oral use. METHOD: A number of 61 patients was included in an observational retrospective study of efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS: Prosthetic infections accounted for 50.8% of the cases and chronic osteitis for 36.1%. The causative micro-organisms were Staphylococci (72.2%) and Streptococci (15.3%); 86.5% of these strains were susceptible to erythromycin, 9.6% were erythromycin resistant and susceptible to lincomycin. Clindamycin was associated with either ofloxacine, rifampicin, or teicoplanin in 88.5% and the average course duration was 101 days. A surgical procedure was performed in 84% of cases. Complete cure was obtained in 91.1% at 18 months of follow up. Only one cutaneous rash and one Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea occurred. The other adverse effects were gastrointestinal in 36%, cutaneous in 6.6%, and hematological in 1.6%, but did not lead to discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSION: Clindamycin can be used in OAI in association with or as an alternative to rifampicin, fluoroquinolones, or glycopeptides according to microbiological data.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Ósseas/microbiologia , Clindamicina/uso terapêutico , Artropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Artropatias/microbiologia , Osteíte/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Ósseas/etiologia , Clindamicina/administração & dosagem , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Quimioterapia Combinada , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Artropatias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Osteíte/etiologia , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rifampina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico
12.
Med Trop (Mars) ; 67(2): 175-8, 2007 Apr.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17691438

RESUMO

The purpose of this report is to describe a case of febrile hypereosinophilic syndrome in a traveler three weeks after returning from a sightseeing trip to Guinea. Laboratory testing demonstrated an inflammatory response syndrome and hepatic cytolysis. Parasite serology led to suspicion of toxocariasis that was treated using albendazole. Follow-up tests at two months showed the presence of Schistosoma mansoni eggs in stools despite negative standard serodiagnostic testing (hemagglutination). Secondarily Western blot testing of serum samples at one, two and 14 months after returning from Guinea continued to show only protein bands specific to toxocariasis with no bands specific to bilhariziasis. These findings provide further evidence of the limitations of serological testing for detection of bilharziasis in travelers and the difficulty of diagnosis. Guinea is a high-risk tourist destination. Intestinal and urinary bilharziasis are endemic over three-fourths of country. Travelers planning even short stays in areas where bilharziasis is endemic should be advised on preventive measures.


Assuntos
Erros de Diagnóstico , Síndrome Hipereosinofílica/parasitologia , Esquistossomose mansoni/diagnóstico , Viagem , Animais , Western Blotting , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Fezes/parasitologia , Guiné , Testes de Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Schistosoma mansoni/isolamento & purificação , Esquistossomose mansoni/sangue
13.
Rev Med Interne ; 27(12): 966-9, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16997430

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Streptococcus pneumoniae primary peritonitis is rare. The diagnosis is uneasy and the treatment is not standardised. CASE REPORT: We report a single case of S. pneumoniae primary peritonitis needing surgical treatment. DISCUSSION: S. pneumoniae primary peritonitis can be medically treated. Surgery is needed in case of sepsis, associated digestive injuries or failure of medical treatment.


Assuntos
Peritonite/microbiologia , Peritonite/terapia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Peritonite/diagnóstico , Peritonite/tratamento farmacológico , Peritonite/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...